Sunbird24
Member
My understanding of the delay to delivery of the class 88 is that they have not yet been given approval to run on the UK railways.
Didn't the 92s have two pantographs?
All the class 91s were built with a single pantograph. One class 91 (91114 I seem to recall) was fitted with a second pantograph (in East Coast days I think, so quite recently) as a prototype to eliminate a single-point failure.All the BR AC Electric locos only had 1 pantograph. Possibly some of the early ones had 2 but if so they were soon modified to 1. I think there is at least 1 class 91 with 2 pans but this is the exception rather than the the rule.
All the class 91s were built with a single pantograph. One class 91 (91114 I seem to recall) was fitted with a second pantograph (in East Coast days I think, so quite recently) as a prototype to eliminate a single-point failure.
Classes 81-85 (AL1-AL5) were all built with 2 pantographs, but one was later removed on all of these.
Class 86 (AL6), 87 & 90 were all built with just one.
Sorry, I've clearly spent too much time in Germany and forgotten what UK locos are like
The odd thing is, the use of dual pantographs seems to be taken very seriously here, it's not just a spare. Whenever the loco direction is changed, the pantograph is swapped. Shunt moves like run rounds are usually done with both pantographs up. Just another of those things that are considered essential in one country and unnecessary in another I guess, like yellow painted front ends, lineside fences, inter-multiple unit corridor connections, cab wing mirrors, wheel tappers etc.
My memory of the Manchester Sheffield electric locos was that they had both pantographs in use at all times. I always wondered why this was.
Word is that the "technical issues" which were holding up the approval to run on UK railways have now been resolved and deliveries are expected to commence in November.
Today 88002, 88007, No 8 and another unliveried one were visible.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
88001 at Velim starts a 1500ton load in diesel mode.
https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=...C5EC!7469&parId=8C806B14A9C6C5EC!6931&o=OneUp
In another developement there are 3 cargo ships at Sagunto anchorage awaiting loads?
Superb video! How do you manage to capture movements inside Velim? Sounds great, maybe not as good as the 68's but they are bi mode so it makes up for it. Where is Sagunto Anchorage?
Not my video but the link was posted elsewhere on the internet.
I would not expect a small engine to make quite the same noise as one 4 times its size!
Sagunto anchorage is a few kilometres south-east of Sagunto port where many of the 68s have been shipped from and is 12 kms up the coast from the factory. Although the low-loaders still have to go into the city to turn on a large roundabout access to Sagunto Port is direct off the motorways north of the city while motorway access to Valencia port is best from the southern motorways. Access to Valencia port from the north can be difficult even by car due to heavy traffic and narrow streets with sharp bends.
The class 88 looks to perform well even with a small diesel power unit.
It looks exactly how a 950 bhp diesel engine would perform on such a load, in dry warm conditions, on a flat track, at low speed.
. . . . . I think there is at least 1 class 91 with 2 pans but this is the exception rather than the the rule.
It was an experiment, and the second pantograph was subsequently removed. While it was fitted, its location required the cab doors at 'the blunt end' to remain out of use, which resulted in that locomotive having a slightly reduced capability rather than an increased resilience.All the class 91s were built with a single pantograph. One class 91 (91114 I seem to recall) was fitted with a second pantograph (in East Coast days I think, so quite recently) as a prototype to eliminate a single-point failure.
Are the tall bogies to make it shuntable on Iberian Gauge?
On Friday afternoon I saw one of the class 88 locos in DRS livery being hauled on flat bed , on A1 Autovia (motorway) going suothbound towards Madrit from direction of Burgos. I wonder why it was there . I may be the one , which is in Valencia now.
I did overtake it at speed going in this same direction. The lorry, with loco on it, was going very slowly uphill so I had no time to see the loco number.
I'm sure that the class 88 will be successful but perhaps something with a bit more oomph could be next. How about a co co with an ex hst 2250hp engine. Class 89 with an engine!!
K
I'm sure that the class 88 will be successful but perhaps something with a bit more oomph could be next. How about a co co with an ex hst 2250hp engine. Class 89 with an engine!!
K
I'm assuming Stadler's design isn't intended for the UK loading guage, but if we pretend for a moment that somebody could produce a genuine bi-mode loco for the UK I would suggest it could be used for:Despite the fact that Stadler are developing such a locomotive (i.e. a genuine bi-mode item, not just a 'last mile' diesel), what exactly would you do with them in the UK?
Possibly, but the factory do have multi-gauge lines which include Iberian, standard and metre gauges. 88008 is on the same line behind it on its normal bogies (it's buffers can just be seen at the extreme left of the picture) and the train on the adjacent track is a Sheffield tram, also standard gauge. The French locos use the same tracks and they are standard gauge also. Perhaps there is some other obscure reason. Normally only the 3' 6" South African locos use accommodation sleds under the standard wheels which only raise it a few inches higher.Yes, they're only factory accommodation bogies, so they'd have their standard gauge ones fitted before removal by road.