VTPreston_Tez
Member
Scottish services to Bristol and Bournemouth via the WCML should never have been withdrawn.
Most heritage railways are boring, tatty and pointless. Railway preservationists would be better employed buying (and demolishing) the buildings on the GCR between Leicester North and Rugby central.
Most heritage railways are boring, tatty and pointless. Railway preservationists would be better employed buying (and demolishing) the buildings on the GCR between Leicester North and Rugby central.
Most heritage railways are like old fashioned zoos. What they try to do is admirable, but it is so sad seeing our railway past rusting away in sidings, knowing that most of it will never see use again. My local, (the Northampton and lamport) is the prime example. I guess it would take at least £30m and a lot of sweet talking with NR to get it from castle station to harborough, and build an undercover depot. We have to be realistic and accept that it will never happen without a large lottery win or a massive blob of luck
There are also some stations that have ticket offices managed by local travel agencies or a small business proprietor. Examples I can think of are Gobowen and Chester-le-Street.
I think you might be judging all heritage lines by the work of the Northampton and Lamport.
Most heritage lines do no have things rusting away everywhere, and have a good solid buissness and finicial management. I think any attraction that attracts over 100,000 people a year (as many heritage lines do) is not pointless.
Examples being the NYMR KWVR SVR South Devon, West somerset, Paington and Dartmouth, Lakeside, great central and bluebell. The list could go on but my memory has given up at that.
All units want burning! Bring back mk3's.......
And repatriate all the class 87s from Bulgaria. Then start using them on the Birmingham - Glasgow / Edinburgh services.
Scottish services to Bristol and Bournemouth via the WCML should never have been withdrawn.
Posters on this site are more polite than many other discussion forums.
John (51 as well)
Posters on this site are more polite than many other discussion forums.
John (51 as well)
All trains should have headcode boxes and should be forced to display them at all times.
I'll add another of mine: What were SWT thinking when they decided 158s were the future (when getting rid of all their 170s)?
Most heritage railways are boring, tatty and pointless. Railway preservationists would be better employed buying (and demolishing) the buildings on the GCR between Leicester North and Rugby central.
Pendos and Voyagers aren't really terrible and photograph quite well: it's just that they trample over my Crewe childhood memories of 90s, 86s, 87s, DVTs, 47s etc.
Alstom-built trains are underrated, particularly the 175s. Bombardier-built trains are overrated, particularly the 170s.
Max (16)