ralphchadkirk
Established Member
I have never suggested it be banned.
I have suggested they should be ignored.
My apologies then - I must have misunderstood. Therefore we both agree on that point.
I have never suggested it be banned.
I have suggested they should be ignored.
I couldn't find anything about Plymouth. What I did find was that a parade in West Bromwich had been cancelled. But this was not because of fear of annoying local ethnic minorities, but because the local BNP and other right-wing groups were using the parade to stir up violence against other ethnic groups. A world of difference.Well they were all cancelled (or not organised) in Plymouth.
Snapper
Some current examples of Sharia Law, and Islamic-style justice.
Persecution of political opponents
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2010/01/09/iran-end-persecution-peaceful-activists
Executed for having been Raped
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gytDdO471yA
Genocide
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/3918765.stm
I am surprised that you find both the Human Rights Watch and BBC websites to be misleading, especially as both organisations have ben widely quoted by the various Left Wing organisations and media, such as The Guardian. I presume you will point out to the two organisations that they are publishing misleading information, to prevent any future issues ?And more examples of misleading quotes
An on the Contrary Sharia Law is used to justify the various attricities committed, as you well know.Persecution of political opponents is hardly an application of Sharia law and neither was the Genocide in Darfur.
Old tricks die hard, eh Snapper ?But that does not entitle anyone to try and tar all of them with the same brush - or all Moslems - which is what you are trying to do..
Ah, yes Phase 2. Throw in the racism card.You try to claim that your view is reasoned and that you are not tarring everyone with the same brush. Your posts and your attitude suggest otherwise. Just reading through what you have been saying in this thread makes it apparent that you are as keen to stir up discord as the people that you condemn.
Ah, yes Phase 2. Throw in the racism card.
I am not English, I am British.
It is both an interesting and saddening comparison that a frontline soldier in Afghanistan earns £17,004 a year compared to Choudary who claims £25,740 a year in benefits.
This individual contributes absolutely nothing to this Country in any way and is simply a drain on our welfare, social, and housing provisions.
As I understand matters, to claim these benefits, Choudary should be "actively seeking work", something I suspect he has not done, nor presumably has any intention of doing. Instead he spends his time creating disharmony, rabble rouisng and appearing in TV studios, seemingly without let or hindrance.
It says much for the attitude of this Government that the purveyors of hatred and war against the UK are paid more than those who seek to defend the UK.
One wonders if anyone will dare to look closely at Choudray's entitlement to these benefits if he is not actively seeking work, and indeed on the basis of how he spends his time, never can be, thus being in violation of the requirements to receive benefit ?
Benefit means tested according to political and religious views?
I know, terrible isn't it. No-one can spell "to". We're doomed.What is this country coming too? :cry:
Good luck getting an English passport!And I am not British, I am English
Some people from Yorkshire and Cornwall would probably say the same about England!Britain doesn't come in to it anywhere, it's a collection of nationalities in my view, not a nationality in itself. A
It's far too easy to pretend to be seeking work from what I've heard. I've indirectly heard of enthusiasts travelling up and down the country while on job seekers allowance, and falsifying claims that they have job interviews, they were overheard saying how easy it is. I agree it should be a lot tougher to claim these benefits, but certainly for everyone irrespective of race or religion. There's loads of 'chavs' (or whatever people want to call them) near here who are basically unemployable and on drugs who get loads of benefits.Old Timer said:One wonders if anyone will dare to look closely at Choudray's entitlement to these benefits if he is not actively seeking work, and indeed on the basis of how he spends his time, never can be, thus being in violation of the requirements to receive benefit ?
thefab444 - surely Europe is just a collection of nationalities too?
Can you put a quote against that statement please as I cannot see any comments reflecting that point of view in this thread?
Umm, Old Timer is saying what everyone is thinking! Anjem Choudhary is supposedly claiming Jobseekers Allowance but yet doesn't seem to be engaged in looking for work - and let's not forget he is a trained lawyer. Instead of looking for employment as he should be, he seeks to create disharmony and rabble rouse. Why the hell should my taxes support this waste of space?! His political and religious views are irrelevant - the fact is he is taking taxpayer's money under false pretences and it should be stopped.
Tbh Snapper, I suspect the Evening Standard have no idea either!!! Alas it's a private matter for the Gentleman concerned! Some papers say he is on JSA, some say he isn't - but we do know he is receiving taxpayers' money in some form. Morally acceptable given that he denounces everything Britain stands for? I don't think so!
Yes quite, a case of the pot calling the kettle black.The sad thing is that the gullible fall for it and others use it for their own ends.