Robertj21a
On Moderation
- Joined
- 22 Sep 2013
- Messages
- 7,520
If the line closes, we'd lose one of the most charming lines in the country. It's not all about money.
Well, it is actually, if there isn't any !
If the line closes, we'd lose one of the most charming lines in the country. It's not all about money.
Well, it is actually, if there isn't any !
Aren't there two flaws with that (at least one of which may be urban legend):
1. The influx of traffic would cripple the island's road network
2. Grey squirrels would be able to access the island, and would threaten the red squirrel population
?
To me the only way to stop the usage decline would be to have it integrated with (run by?) Southern Vectis. A knackered old railway can barely compete with what is probably the best (in quality, frequency and coverage) rural bus service in the UK, possibly even in the world. (It's a bit expensive but the tourists seem not to mind and it's free for passholders anyway).
But realistically it should probably close. A battery powered golf buggy style shuttle or two, or some kind of automated lightweight pier tram/rubber tyred shuttle, would do the job for the passengers who can't/won't walk the pier. (To most people it's a not unpleasant walk unless the weather is terrible - possibly part of the walkway could be enclosed to solve that).
But if the pier is that knackered, should it be demolished and the catamaran perhaps run to Cowes instead? Plenty of Cowes-Ryde buses. [edit: fixed]
Quite - and the problem with the Island Line is the infrastructure cannot last forever. Which is why a long hard look is needed to work out the best step for this. It *could* be light rail with reduced signalling requirements, lighter rolling stock etc which would actually offer a better service.
Yes it's interesting that Privitisation has almost frozen the railway to a great extent. We have what we have and we must run and keep it (with a few exceptions)! I can't help but feel that BR and the pre-nationalisation railway would have also thrown in the towel by now but because of the way that franchising has worked out it soldiers on for now.It was given a lifeline in 1966 - 67 with a very cheap and sensible electrification , the needs and value are now (regrettably) a lot different. I suspect even the pre nationalised railway would have thrown in the towel by now .....
Yes it's interesting that Privitisation has almost frozen the railway to a great extent. We have what we have and we must run and keep it (with a few exceptions)! I can't help but feel that BR and the pre-nationalisation railway would have also thrown in the towel by now but because of the way that franchising has worked out it soldiers on for now.
Having used it this weekend I must admit my gut reaction is simply to shut the whole thing down. The bus service is excellent (and I speak as someone who isn't a fan of buses) and blows the service offered by the line out of the water. If if a a had somehow maintained a link from Ryde to Ventnor and Newport there maybe more of a case for investing and upgrading the line but in it's present form it's a dead duck. Put it out of its misery and either convert parts of it to a tramway or just give up the whole lot (though probably allow the steam railway to extend to Ryde St John's road).
Ha may have unknowingly bumped into you in that case as there were several other Forumites on the island this weekend!The service I departed Shanklin on was full and standing, not bad for an October Sunday. That's departing from a station that had an almost constant flow of free 'Beer and Buses' services arriving and departing, too.
Having also used it this weekend, I think that's a tad misleading. Ryde to Sandown or Shanklin is a meandering trek by bus, ...
They have said the opposite, but they do not want to take over Ryde to Shanklin.I thought the IOWSR have already said they don't want to extend to Ryde SJ?
They have said the opposite, but they do not want to take over Ryde to Shanklin.
Another long shot:
Get hold of some of the DLR units soon to be superseded. Apart from the door mechanisms, most of the clever stuff on these is under the floor, so cut off the upper superstructure and re-build with something that fits the gauge. If driverless is a step too far, provide a cab partition and ergonomic seat in front of the existing controls.
Ha may have unknowingly bumped into you in that case as there were several other Forumites on the island this weekend!
But surely that's just it the services were busy but there was an event on to drive that demand. I wonder how busy it'll be next weekend?
When Berlin U55 joins up with the rest of the U5, wouldn’t it be possible for the older U55 stock to get through the Ryde tunnel? They’ll be free from 2019, and seem pretty reliable.
So then who would run RSJ to the pier?!
.. It's not all about money.
Yes, its island nature makes it a little more expensive to run than would normally be the case for a social railway, but luckily it is next door to one of the most profitable commuter railways in the country which can cross-subsidise it.
They have said the opposite, but they do not want to take over Ryde to Shanklin.
There seems to be a lot of defeatism on this thread.
The route may not have as many passengers as in the bucket and spade heyday, but it has more than enough passengers to justify continued services.
Yes, its island nature makes it a little more expensive to run than would normally be the case for a social railway, but luckily it is next door to one of the most profitable commuter railways in the country which can cross-subsidise it.
Not anymore; it's funding is now up to the IWC and the operator.
In an ideal world i would have hoped for a massive investment plan but privatisation has not helped the island line.